Home
HegeMon [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
HegeMon

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

(no subject) [Nov. 22nd, 2007|06:20 pm]
[Tags|]

I would like to say that today's highlight was coming home from a day without internet access (well, not much) to discover what a shambles the Liberal campaign has become.

But instead it was stumbling across the the spooky men's chorale (with about four times the usual number of members), in the mall at lunchtime performing this.
link2 comments|post comment

(no subject) [Nov. 19th, 2007|11:43 am]
[Tags|]

Now I understand why the right is so primed to attack Gillard at the drop of a hat, and with such ferocity.  It is because she is fucking brilliant:

"I'm here to answer your questions. So there's two ways this interview can go, you can act like a jilted lover and we can do that for several minutes, or you can ask me any political questions you've got and we can start them. Rove is a good way of engaging with voters who - with the greatest respect Barrie - don't get up on this time on a Sunday morning and watch the political shows."

Transcript.

Man, I can't wait 'till she is PM... It will be like Paul Keating and Barry Jones' secret love-child.
linkpost comment

(no subject) [Nov. 15th, 2007|11:55 am]
[Tags|]

Situation:
The reserve bank and other economic performers* calling for restraint in spending, but both political parties are spending a shite-load this election.

Theory:
The Coalition knew from the beginning it was doomed, so has gone on this insane spendathon to make it mandatory for Labor to do similar... causing interest rate and general economic pain that can then be used from opposition to re-gain government with a "we told you so" attitude.


*  Because I refuse to call the academics, it seems to me more like some kind of impressionist abstract poetry
link2 comments|post comment

(no subject) [Nov. 9th, 2007|08:28 am]
[Tags|]

Occasionally having the radio tuned to ABC news pays off (well, more than usual)… Each morning they have an interview, often it is a pollie (i.e.: the PM).  Anyway, today this little gem slipped out of Howard’s mouth:

 
“If you don’t have a job, you can’t afford childcare!”

link1 comment|post comment

(no subject) [Nov. 2nd, 2007|09:29 am]
[Tags|]

If Costello says: "It doesn't reflect well on Family First. It doesn't reflect well on the candidate," about this.. What does he have to say about this?
linkpost comment

(no subject) [Oct. 31st, 2007|08:29 am]
[Tags|]

I had always thought that Tony Abbott was a cunt, but not quite a fucking cunt...  But then today hidden away in the arse end of an article I found these gems:

But Mr Abbott said the fact the ALP was willing to do a preference deal with the Greens - who he said were hostile to many things Christians thought important - should sound a "very cautionary note" to Christians who were considering voting Labor.

"Labor's enthusiasm to do a deal with the Greens I think calls into question (its) depth and sincerity in these areas," Mr Abbott said.

Mr Abbott - the Coalition's most prominent Christian - was speaking to The Age in response to the establishment of a website by The Australian Christian Lobby, which is targeting churchgoers in marginal seats.

He said the criteria the ACL used to assess the parties was up to it, but he pointed out that half the lower house Labor MPs "declined to take an oath on the Bible" after the last election.

"That's not necessarily the be all and end all, but nevertheless it does suggest to me . . . as a collective Labor politicians don't have the degree of Christian commitment (that Coalition politicians do)," he said.


Now I'm not religion's biggest fan (in fact, given the opportunity I would feast upon it's rotting corpse), but this is a new low for the libs... "They are against teh Goddzor!"... great.

The saddest thing is that nobody will pick up on this.





*twitch*

link6 comments|post comment

Because I'm feeling a horrible sence of forboding whenever I read anything political. [Jul. 31st, 2007|09:25 am]
[Tags|]


Kyle's election prediction no.1:  

Family first with balance of power in the senate (on the back of preference deals with well... everybody). 
Sharing it with the Greens if we are very lucky.
linkpost comment

(no subject) [Jul. 27th, 2007|10:22 am]
[Tags|]

Okay, I’m sure this is just one of those “hey, some wacky political personage thinks something stupid” article, but seriously…

 
“Just imagine the radical change that would occur if parents voted not just on their own behalf but on behalf of their children, what that would bring to democracy”

 
I’m yet to be convinced that most people deserve to vote, let alone giving people with kids extras.  I should come up with a good long reasoned argument, instead of just linking to the age and being angry... but words fail me.

This man can go fuck himself with something brittle, jagged and rusty.

link6 comments|post comment

(no subject) [Jun. 28th, 2007|01:09 pm]
[Tags|]

I am wondering if this is legal.
link5 comments|post comment

Dakka-Dakka-Dakka-FOOM [May. 7th, 2007|12:06 pm]
[Tags|]

I’ve possibly said this before, but with the budget coming up and talk that it will include a billion extra for the defence forces to help with recruiting it comes to mind again.

Why not focus recruitment on certain sectors of society for whom the conditions of ADF employment will be a fantastic opportunity. Families where the parents work hard, and the children attend run down state schools with little or no technical education.

I am talking about first or second generation immigrants. 

I can think of no better way for different cultures to gain respect for each other than to see their children marching side by side each April. Imagine the possibilities of having Middle Eastern soldiers to talk with the civilians in Afghanistan, or Islanders to do the same in the Pacific. Australians come from all over the world, and we would be fools not to take advantage of this in our armed forces.

link5 comments|post comment

(no subject) [Apr. 4th, 2007|09:37 am]
[Tags|, ]

Today The Age went and published this.

Jim Schembri should go back to giving craptacular films good reviews.

I think MrLefty sums up my feelings on the matter quite well.

-----

On a lighter note, to make me seem less like a cow-hating bastard:

http://www.ilovecows.com/

[EDIT: However, I still refuse to like dugongs]

-----
link7 comments|post comment

Super Happy Fun Politics [Apr. 2nd, 2007|12:48 pm]
[Tags|]

Okay, I'm gonna go our on a limb here and say what I'm sure a lot of you are thinking.

It is too late, no matter what happens now this whole "human induced climate change" thing is here to stay... and sweet-bugger-all will be done to stop it.

Frankly, if you expect:

  1. China, Russia or India (and the rest of Asia) to do anything at the expense of 'catching up' with the rest of us

  2. Africa give a flying fuck

  3. Europe to actually get something done (meetings, amendments, sub-committees, sub-sub-committees, recommendations and general bureaucratic hell aside).

  4. The US making a complete about-face and stop building new coal power plants... start taxing fuel, or even admit something is happening.



Then you show an optimism that I both admire, and pity.

So, should we simply stop trying?

Should we become the one country that focuses on predicting what is about to happen and making the most out of it?
link14 comments|post comment

(no subject) [Mar. 29th, 2007|10:44 am]
[Tags|]

Ganked shamelessly from LP.


This question is pretty vague because I’d like you guys to throw your ideas down, I’m also really interested in hearing why you think that your dream policy should (or could) be delivered by the government? Think big and small, everything from fixing the potholes in your street to delivering on that old-fashioned world peace thing. What is it that you really really want from your government and how does it fit into your vision of Australia’s future?


Go on then... I'm curious.

[EDIT: Card's blog again... a nice little rant about Mormons running for President. A good read.]
link1 comment|post comment

I could add more age links if you like :P [Mar. 27th, 2007|02:20 pm]
[Tags|]



Having had a good while to get the froth good and flowing, the hounds have decided that the main gist of this whole Hicks thing is:

He plead guilty.
ergo: you are a bunch of poofters for loving him for the last five years... the trial was fair and people can shut up now.

Now, I'm not somebody who would ever argue against a fair trial.
Let us be honest here... this whole thing was a debate between two points of view:

  1. Traitor! KillKillBloooooodKill!

  2. Jail maybe? Don't we have anti-mercenary laws or something? Whoa... what's with the hiding in Cuba so no 'basic human rights' apply?


I'm definitely not somebody who said this guy was a sweet innocent little lamb... in fact, I don't think any of us did. From the start it was fairly obvious this guy had gone off to fight for a Theocracy. If you know me you know what I would think of anybody who did that.
What we took offense with was the complete lack of basic legal standards that some of us optimistic lefty types actually consider an important part of our fucking culture.

I see a 'trial' where the judge dismissed two thirds of the defence team before a plea could be entered. I see a 'trial' where only members of the US military could participate. I see the justification that it is wartime, but I remember no official declaration being made by my government. I see a shambles.
I see most people not caring.



I see Howard/Costello winning an election.
linkpost comment

(no subject) [Mar. 26th, 2007|11:13 am]
[Tags|]

Wow, what an absolute thumping. Against an incrediby unpopular Government the NSW opposition is crushed.

21 seats out of 93. Whoa.
(okay, 34 including the Nats, but that is still against Labor's 53)

Having not seen much about this election down here in Vic, how utterly crap must the Libs be in NSW?
link2 comments|post comment

(no subject) [Mar. 20th, 2007|11:57 am]
[Tags|]

Bwahahaha!

*sigh*

So waiting for Tampa... or something.
linkpost comment

(no subject) [Mar. 6th, 2007|09:56 am]
[Tags|]

I've always kinda liked Andrew Bartlett, even after his party passed the GST and got Family First elected... Mostly because I met him in Wholefoods once and he was basically a good guy.

I kinda wish he would switch to the Greens.

Anyway, he has a blog, and here is a quote:

"The winning formula for the next election has suddenly become clear. All one side has to do is get Brian Burke to walk around the halls of Parliament House and greet people as they come out of their offices. Like some walking, man-sized ebola virus..."

---

Contrary to what people may think, I _like_ having intelligent conservatives writing about things. It beats the hell out of the circus that passes for right-wing opinion in today's world. So how about this:

Orson Scott Card has a weekly column. How did I miss this for so long?

---

Rent rage, a good long article from the age about the current rent situation in Melbourne.
---
link3 comments|post comment

(no subject) [Jan. 31st, 2007|01:36 pm]
[Tags|]

Graaaaaaaaargh!
link20 comments|post comment

(no subject) [Jan. 25th, 2007|11:43 am]
[Tags|]

Well, what a surprise

Combined with this, it paints a pretty disturbing picture of the Libs. While some people have no problem with this, I have serious problems with out PM sucking up to Danny Nalliah's church. The guy happily allies with The Australian League of Rights


Also, the first article mentions one of the people involved in the Tas adds as "Mr Urquhart". While not seriously scary, I find it amusing.
link1 comment|post comment

(no subject) [Dec. 14th, 2006|04:33 pm]
[Tags|]


Outcast of Camp Echo

A long, detailed write-up of David Hicks' situation.

Well worth the read.
linkpost comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]

Advertisement